Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College vs Southern Regional Technical College: which has better ROI?
Neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings, but Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College comes closer — median earnings $34,996 against a $27,368 total, vs $31,293 at Southern Regional Technical College. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College | Southern Regional Technical College |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $6,842 | $813 |
| Total net cost | $27,368 | $3,252 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $34,996 | $31,293 |
| Median debt | $16,750 | — |
| Payback | — | — |
| 20-year net return | -$294,648 | -$344,592 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Which is cheaper, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College or Southern Regional Technical College?
Southern Regional Technical College, at $813 a year after aid versus $6,842 — a gap of $6,029 a year, or $24,116 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.
Do Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College or Southern Regional Technical College graduates earn more?
Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College graduates report a median $34,996 ten years after entry, $3,703 more than the $31,293 at Southern Regional Technical College. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.
Which graduates more of its students?
36% of students finish at Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, against 31% at Southern Regional Technical College. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.