Advance Beauty College vs Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula: which has better ROI?
Neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings, but Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula comes closer — median earnings $22,452 against a $111,400 total, vs $11,575 at Advance Beauty College. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Advance Beauty College | Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $10,358 | $27,850 |
| Total net cost | $41,432 | $111,400 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $11,575 | $22,452 |
| Median debt | — | $12,858 |
| Payback | — | — |
| 20-year net return | -$777,132 | -$629,560 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Which is cheaper, Advance Beauty College or Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula?
Advance Beauty College, at $10,358 a year after aid versus $27,850 — a gap of $17,492 a year, or $69,968 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.
Do Advance Beauty College or Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula graduates earn more?
Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula graduates report a median $22,452 ten years after entry, $10,877 more than the $11,575 at Advance Beauty College. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.
Which graduates more of its students?
69% of students finish at Paul Mitchell the School-Temecula, against 67% at Advance Beauty College. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.