Cameron University vs Tulsa Technology Center: which has better ROI?
Neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings, but Tulsa Technology Center comes closer — median earnings $41,793 against a $22,892 total, vs $40,118 at Cameron University. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Cameron University | Tulsa Technology Center |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $10,912 | $5,723 |
| Total net cost | $43,648 | $22,892 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $40,118 | $41,793 |
| Median debt | $21,500 | — |
| Payback | — | — |
| 20-year net return | -$208,488 | -$154,232 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Which is cheaper, Cameron University or Tulsa Technology Center?
Tulsa Technology Center, at $5,723 a year after aid versus $10,912 — a gap of $5,189 a year, or $20,756 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.
Do Cameron University or Tulsa Technology Center graduates earn more?
Tulsa Technology Center graduates report a median $41,793 ten years after entry, $1,675 more than the $40,118 at Cameron University. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.
Which graduates more of its students?
81% of students finish at Tulsa Technology Center, against 31% at Cameron University. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.