Colorado State University Global vs Emily Griffith Technical College: which has better ROI?
The verdict
Colorado State University Global has the better ROI: it clears its 4-year net cost of $66,040 in 2.3 years versus not at all at Emily Griffith Technical College, on median earnings of $76,813 vs $35,487 ten years out. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Colorado State University Global | Emily Griffith Technical College |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $16,510 | $7,197 |
| Total net cost | $66,040 | $28,788 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $76,813 | $35,487 |
| Median debt | $25,000 | — |
| Payback | 2.3 yrs | — |
| 20-year net return | $503,020 | -$286,248 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Colorado State University Global vs Emily Griffith Technical College: frequently asked questions
Is Colorado State University Global or Emily Griffith Technical College a better value?
Colorado State University Global. It clears its $66,040 net cost in about 2.3 years versus no clear payback at Emily Griffith Technical College, on median earnings of $76,813 vs $35,487 ten years out.
Which is cheaper, Colorado State University Global or Emily Griffith Technical College?
Emily Griffith Technical College: $7,197/yr net price after aid versus $16,510/yr at Colorado State University Global — a difference of $9,313 a year, or about $37,252 over four years.
Do Colorado State University Global or Emily Griffith Technical College graduates earn more?
Colorado State University Global graduates earn a median $76,813 ten years after entry, versus $35,487 at Emily Griffith Technical College — a $41,326 gap. This blends every major, so a specific field can flip it.