Emily Griffith Technical College vs Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora: which has better ROI?
Neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings, but Emily Griffith Technical College comes closer — median earnings $35,487 against a $28,788 total, vs $34,657 at Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Emily Griffith Technical College | Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $7,197 | $37,153 |
| Total net cost | $28,788 | $148,612 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $35,487 | $34,657 |
| Median debt | — | $9,500 |
| Payback | — | — |
| 20-year net return | -$286,248 | -$422,672 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Which is cheaper, Emily Griffith Technical College or Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora?
Emily Griffith Technical College, at $7,197 a year after aid versus $37,153 — a gap of $29,956 a year, or $119,824 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.
Do Emily Griffith Technical College or Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora graduates earn more?
Emily Griffith Technical College graduates report a median $35,487 ten years after entry, $830 more than the $34,657 at Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.