Emily Griffith Technical College vs Aveda Institute-Denver: which has better ROI?
Neither clears its cost on institution-wide earnings, but Emily Griffith Technical College comes closer — median earnings $35,487 against a $28,788 total, vs $38,020 at Aveda Institute-Denver. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Emily Griffith Technical College | Aveda Institute-Denver |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $7,197 | $20,167 |
| Total net cost | $28,788 | $80,668 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $35,487 | $38,020 |
| Median debt | — | $9,829 |
| Payback | — | — |
| 20-year net return | -$286,248 | -$287,468 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Which is cheaper, Emily Griffith Technical College or Aveda Institute-Denver?
Emily Griffith Technical College, at $7,197 a year after aid versus $20,167 — a gap of $12,970 a year, or $51,880 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.
Do Emily Griffith Technical College or Aveda Institute-Denver graduates earn more?
Aveda Institute-Denver graduates report a median $38,020 ten years after entry, $2,533 more than the $35,487 at Emily Griffith Technical College. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.
Which graduates more of its students?
97% of students finish at Emily Griffith Technical College, against 84% at Aveda Institute-Denver. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.