Lipscomb University vs King University: which has better ROI?
King University has the better ROI: it clears its 4-year net cost of $89,388 in 7.8 years versus 13.8 years at Lipscomb University, on median earnings of $59,831 vs $55,541 ten years out. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)
| Measure | Lipscomb University | King University |
|---|---|---|
| Net price / yr | $24,739 | $22,347 |
| Total net cost | $98,956 | $89,388 |
| Median earnings, 10 yrs | $55,541 | $59,831 |
| Median debt | $19,500 | $22,750 |
| Payback | 13.8 yrs | 7.8 yrs |
| 20-year net return | $44,664 | $140,032 |
College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.
Which is cheaper, Lipscomb University or King University?
King University, at $22,347 a year after aid versus $24,739 — a gap of $2,392 a year, or $9,568 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.
Do Lipscomb University or King University graduates earn more?
King University graduates report a median $59,831 ten years after entry, $4,290 more than the $55,541 at Lipscomb University. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.
Which leaves students with less debt, Lipscomb University or King University?
Lipscomb University: its completers carry a median $19,500 in federal loans versus $22,750 at King University, a difference of $3,250. The figure counts students who finished; it excludes private loans and anyone who left before graduating.
Which graduates more of its students?
72% of students finish at Lipscomb University, against 48% at King University. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.