Degree Dividend
Sourced from federal dataEvery figure datedNo rankings for sale

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley vs Texas A&M University-Kingsville: which has better ROI?

Public, Edinburg TX · vs · Public, Kingsville TX

The verdict

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley has the better ROI: it clears its 4-year net cost of $19,324 in 15.3 years versus 15.7 years at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, on median earnings of $49,620 vs $51,450 ten years out. (Scorecard, 2026 · our math.)

Share
Head to head
MeasureThe University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyTexas A&M University-Kingsville
Net price / yr$4,831$12,090
Total net cost$19,324$48,360
Median earnings, 10 yrs$49,620$51,450
Median debt$12,950$22,934
Payback15.3 yrs15.7 yrs
20-year net return$5,876$13,440

College Scorecard (2026), institution-level · payback and returns are our math. Figures blend all majors.

Which is cheaper, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley or Texas A&M University-Kingsville?

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, at $4,831 a year after aid versus $12,090 — a gap of $7,259 a year, or $29,036 across the full degree. These are net prices after grants and scholarships, not sticker prices, so they reflect what an aided student pays.

Do The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley or Texas A&M University-Kingsville graduates earn more?

Texas A&M University-Kingsville graduates report a median $51,450 ten years after entry, $1,830 more than the $49,620 at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. Both are institution-wide medians from federal tax records, so a high-paying major at the lower school can beat the average at the higher one.

Which leaves students with less debt, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley or Texas A&M University-Kingsville?

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley: its completers carry a median $12,950 in federal loans versus $22,934 at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a difference of $9,984. The figure counts students who finished; it excludes private loans and anyone who left before graduating.

Which graduates more of its students?

51% of students finish at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, against 42% at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. Completion matters to the ROI arithmetic because a degree that is never finished still carries its cost and its debt, but earns none of the graduate premium above the $48,360 high-school baseline.

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley vs Texas A&M University-Kingsville: frequently asked questions

Is The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley or Texas A&M University-Kingsville a better value?
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. It clears its $19,324 net cost in about 15.3 years versus 15.7 years at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, on median earnings of $49,620 vs $51,450 ten years out.
Which is cheaper, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley or Texas A&M University-Kingsville?
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley: $4,831/yr net price after aid versus $12,090/yr at Texas A&M University-Kingsville — a difference of $7,259 a year, or about $29,036 over four years.
Do The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley or Texas A&M University-Kingsville graduates earn more?
Texas A&M University-Kingsville graduates earn a median $51,450 ten years after entry, versus $49,620 at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley — a $1,830 gap. This blends every major, so a specific field can flip it.